Domenica 26 Luglio 2026 08:54:57 GMT+02:00

Netcrook

HomeManifesto
News
Corporate Security IncidentsCloud, SaaS & Identity SecurityIndustrial Cybersecurity & Critical InfrastructureCyber Intelligence, TrendsAI Security & Agentic SystemsCyber Intelligence & Threat TrendsCyber WarfareCyber Warfare & Nation-State OperationsCyber CriminalityBreaches & Data LeaksCybercrimeMalware & BotnetsRansomware & ExtortionSecurity Awareness & Social EngineeringLegal PolicyLegal, Policy & Government CybersecurityPrivacy, Regulation & ComplianceTechnology, InnovationTechnology, Innovation & Digital InfrastructureVulnerabilities Patch ManagementResearch, Exploits & Offensive SecurityVulnerabilities & Patch Management
Techcrook
Tutte le tecnologieIdentita e accessoFirewall e reteBackup e archiviazioneEnergia e continuitaPrivacy e sicurezza fisicaLaboratorio e prototipazioneStampa e tracciabilitaTecnologia quotidiana
Geocrook
AfricaAsiaEuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaOceaniaSouth America
WikicrookTeamAppContattiLogin
ItalianoEnglish

#commit hashes

GitHub’s Green Badge Meets a Hard Problem: Identity That Can Be Rewritten

08 July 2026 16:48Research, Exploits & Offensive SecurityNorth America / USAPATCHVIPER

Research tied to signed commits suggests that a trusted-looking hash can change while GitHub still shows “Verified,” forcing teams to rethink what their review process really proves.

#GitHub Verified | #signed commits | #commit hashes

When a Verified Badge Stops Being a Unique Fingerprint

08 July 2026 16:22Research, Exploits & Offensive SecurityNorth America / USADEBUGSAGE

A security disclosure around GitHub commit verification shows why a trusted badge can still hide a tricky identity problem for supply-chain tooling.

#GitHub Verified | #signed commit | #commit hashes