India's temporary block on Telegram highlights a familiar security problem: digital content can be staged to look like proof, even when the timeline is the real target.
A seized phone or computer can be central to criminal evidence, but if the original device is lost or destroyed, verification, defense rights, and procedural stability can all come under strain.
A Rome conference put a hard truth at the center of cybercrime policy: digital evidence is only useful when countries can move it, verify it, and trust it fast enough.
A conference talk in Rome turned generative AI into a forensic problem: useful for analysis, but only defensible when its steps are auditable, reproducible, and tied to preserved evidence.
A legal and technical reset is taking shape around seized phones and devices: the argument is no longer about grabbing everything, but about what can be copied, reviewed, and retained without overreaching.
As digital forensics and AI-powered chatbots invade the courtroom, legal professionals face a new era of responsibility and risk.
A dawn raid, a missing laptop, and the legal landmines you never expected-here’s what to know if your tech is seized at home or work.
As AI-generated deepfakes infiltrate courtrooms, the very notion of evidence is thrown into crisis.
Without an unbroken chain of custody, digital evidence risks becoming legally worthless.
AXA partners with MomentProof to deploy patented technology that cryptographically locks down digital evidence, fighting fraud in the AI age.
As smartphones become crime scenes, Italy’s courts and investigators scramble to redefine digital evidence without sinking constitutional rights.
As technical cookies and analytical tracking mask deeper issues, the trustworthiness of recorded data in Minneapolis is under threat.
Modern crime scenes start at the claims office-where digital evidence is born, preserved, or lost forever.